“Ethical, or secular humanism is a humanist philosophy that upholds reason, ethics, and justice, and specifically rejects the supernatural and the spiritual as the basis of moral reflection and decision-making. Like other types of humanism, secular humanism is a life stance that focuses on the way human beings can lead good, happy and functional lives”. -wikipedia
As good as that sounds, the whole point here is to be guaranteed a nice, happy after/next life. How can I do that without the supernatural? I can’t. Secular humanism is basically atheists that like social gatherings. I would probably be all about this if I was healthy. Unfortunately the sick like me have to worry constantly about what’s next so that what we have now can suck a little less. I don’t want my pain to have been for nothing. I want the pay off.
“Humanists endorse universal morality based on the commonality of human nature, and that knowledge of right and wrong is based on our best understanding of our individual and joint interests, rather than stemming from a transcendental or arbitrarily local source, therefore rejecting faith completely as a basis for action. The humanist ethics goal is a search for viable individual, social and political principles of conduct, judging them on their ability to enhance human well-being and individual responsibility, ultimately eliminating human suffering”.- wikipedia
I have a few problems with this. The first being that I don’t trust human nature. Humans are fickle and easily swayed when it comes to right or wrong. Honestly, I just don’t trust people to do the right thing if no one is watching. I will say as a former atheist, I did always try to be a good person, but if I fell short, I wasn’t so hard on myself, it wasn’t as if I was doomed to hell or anything. As wonderful as this sounds, without hell there is no heaven. Without God, there is no reincarnation. As cheated as I feel with this life, I refuse to accept that. I want a do-over. The second problem with human nature is we don’t learn without suffering. Contentment leads to laziness. If there was no human suffering, then what exactly would we learn from? What would we fix? What would we derive motivation from? We wouldn’t. People are fueled by the need to fix. If there was nothing wrong, we would die from boredom. We thrive on drama. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out, just turn on your evening news. That my friends, is human nature, do you really want to bet on that?
I like the ideas of secular humanism. If I weren’t dying, I’d probably be a secular humanist. However, I am dying and as a terminally ill person, I don’t have the luxury of not believing. I have to believe that there is something better out there, cause if there isn’t then, well, why the fuck am I living with this much pain? Seriously? If there is no point, then it just seems kinda silly to keep living like this, doesn’t it? A lifetime of suck, with no pay-off? I hope not.
I think its safe to say that I would be a secular humanist if I weren’t ill, but since I am ill, I don’t think that this is what I am looking for. I am looking for a faith that can guarantee me a second chance. So as much as I like the idea of secular humanism, I think I’ll have to pass on it for now.
The Editor Uncategorized
Recent Comments